<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twin B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://courtneymandryk.com/2009/05/27/twin-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://courtneymandryk.com/2009/05/27/twin-b/</link>
	<description>personal website hub</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 05:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nottingham solicitors</title>
		<link>http://courtneymandryk.com/2009/05/27/twin-b/comment-page-1/#comment-8626</link>
		<dc:creator>nottingham solicitors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneymandryk.com/?p=250#comment-8626</guid>
		<description>This web page is really a stroll-through for all the data you wished about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and also you’ll undoubtedly discover it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This web page is really a stroll-through for all the data you wished about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and also you’ll undoubtedly discover it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republic Polytechnic</title>
		<link>http://courtneymandryk.com/2009/05/27/twin-b/comment-page-1/#comment-6510</link>
		<dc:creator>Republic Polytechnic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneymandryk.com/?p=250#comment-6510</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve wrote a very well-written entry.
If it&#039;s ok with you, I would like to ask permission to use your article as it relates to my obstruction. I will be happy to negotiate to pay you or hire you for this.

With Regards from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://republicpolytechnicsucks.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Republic Polytechnic&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve wrote a very well-written entry.<br />
If it&#8217;s ok with you, I would like to ask permission to use your article as it relates to my obstruction. I will be happy to negotiate to pay you or hire you for this.</p>
<p>With Regards from<br />
<a href="http://republicpolytechnicsucks.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Republic Polytechnic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preeta</title>
		<link>http://courtneymandryk.com/2009/05/27/twin-b/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Preeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://courtneymandryk.com/?p=250#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>Big hugs.  I will write to you.  That special feeling?  I think it will come back.  You just have to give yourself a bit of time to adjust to the change.  

And yes, you are right -- it happens in 50% of pregnancies, if not even more.  Had you not been tracking so closely from the start, you would not have even known -- 40 years ago, nobody knew about these very early miscarriages.  When you think about it, the whole thing is such a complicated process (as you say in your next post, all that data to read through on a microscopic level!), and there is all that sorting and parsing and furious dividing going on that we take for granted.  It makes complete logical sense for it to go wrong at least half the time (I&#039;ve read that it actually goes wrong *most* of the time, but that early we still don&#039;t know about it because it&#039;s before the first ultrasound, sometimes before the pregnancy test, before, even, the missed period).  And if it does go wrong -- if there is a chromosomal abnormality -- then how amazing that our bodies know just what to do with that, too, at least most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big hugs.  I will write to you.  That special feeling?  I think it will come back.  You just have to give yourself a bit of time to adjust to the change.  </p>
<p>And yes, you are right &#8212; it happens in 50% of pregnancies, if not even more.  Had you not been tracking so closely from the start, you would not have even known &#8212; 40 years ago, nobody knew about these very early miscarriages.  When you think about it, the whole thing is such a complicated process (as you say in your next post, all that data to read through on a microscopic level!), and there is all that sorting and parsing and furious dividing going on that we take for granted.  It makes complete logical sense for it to go wrong at least half the time (I&#8217;ve read that it actually goes wrong *most* of the time, but that early we still don&#8217;t know about it because it&#8217;s before the first ultrasound, sometimes before the pregnancy test, before, even, the missed period).  And if it does go wrong &#8212; if there is a chromosomal abnormality &#8212; then how amazing that our bodies know just what to do with that, too, at least most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

